Fitzpatrick
looks at the story of Jesus and the two disciples on the way to
Emmaus and concludes, “All of Moses' writings, the Psalms, and the
Prophets were actually about him, his suffering, his glorification.”
(Loc 1654/2159) She is quite clear that the Old Testament does not
merely contain references to or truths about Jesus. She writes that
Jesus was saying that “everything he read,” that is, the Old
Testament, was about himself. (Loc 260/2159) Fitzpatrick also reminds
readers that Jesus loves women, loves to instruct them.
That
really piqued my interest because there are some Old Testament
passages that troubled me as a woman. There are OT passages that
value women much below men. An example is Lev. 27:4 where the value
for a man's vow is 50 shekels while a woman's is 30. Fitzpatrick had
emphasized Jesus' love and honor for women so I was interested to see
how these kinds of passage would be interpreted.
But
I was disappointed. Fitzpatrick picks the typical examples of
Abraham, Hagar, Ruth, Esther, etc., that show gospel qualities. She
doesn't choose a story like the unnamed woman in Judges 19 who died
because of being abused by a mob, thanks to a Levite.
Fitzpatrick
went from assuring readers that ALL the Old Testament was about Jesus
to picking out stories and passages that can be related to Jesus and
His work. Rereading Luke 24:27 it seems to me that Jesus explained
all the parts of the Old Testament that were about Himself, not ever
claiming that the entire Old Testament was about Himself.
Fitzpatrick
brings up an interesting concept about finding Messianic fulfillment
meaning in all Bible passages. She notes that reading the Old
Testament this way means “we often have to hold two sometimes very
different meanings in mind at the same time.” (Loc 1304/2159) She
is clear that we do not ignore the original intent of the passage yet
see Jesus in it too. In this way, the Proverbs 31 woman becomes a
description of the bride of Christ. (Loc 1171/2159)
I
have mixed feelings about this study. I think Fitzpatrick makes way
too many assumptions, like that Clopas' wife was Jesus' aunt. This is
based on John 19:25 where Fitzpatrick concludes that the sister of
Jesus' mother is the same as Clopas' wife. There was no punctuation
in the original Greek but modern translators insert a comma, making
them separate people. Fitzpatrick argues that Clopas and his wife
were the two disciples on the way to Emmaus. We just don't know that.
I
would think this study would be best done in a group setting so these
issues could be discussed and not just taken at face value. There are
questions included for discussion or personal reflection.
My
rating: 3/5 stars.
Elyse
Fitzpatrick is a nationally known author and speaker. She holds a
certificate in Biblical Counseling from CCEF, and an MA in counseling
from Trinity Theological Seminary. She has authored twenty-three
books on daily living and the Christian faith. You can find out more
at https://www.elysefitzpatrick.com/.
Bethany
House Publishers, 160 pages.
I
received a complimentary egalley of this book from the publisher. My
comments are an independent and honest review.
No comments:
Post a Comment