data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12bdd/12bdd4779f5907ce8a554afce61e4c9e62b7aea4" alt=""
How
times have changed. Nonetheless, Bayly desires the church return to
those customs of years ago. The Church is our Mother, birthing us, in
a sense, and we should love her. Citing authors and confessions from
hundreds of year ago, Bayly writes, “Outside the church there is
ordinarily no hope of salvation.” (15) Outside of the church, there
is no protection from spiritual attack. “Alone, every man is picked
off by Satan and devoured.” (17) To have the protection of the
Shepherd, we must be in the Church. (17) And you can be in the Church
only if you have been baptized. (23) And not baptized by just
anybody but by an official of the Church. (24) No one can participate
in communion without being in the household of faith and that entry
is granted by the elders of the Church. (23,25)
While
I know Bayly's views have been those of theologians in generations
past, I wonder whether the view of the Church Bayly presents is truly
biblical. He names the “Church” as the Bride of Christ,
referencing Rev. 19:7;21:9 (even though “Church” (ekklesia)
does not appear in those passages). He is convinced that individual
believers are not the Bride of Christ, but only the Church as a
whole. (14) “We are not the Body of Christ individually. No one of
us is the Church.” (17) This, after encouraging us to remember that
“Church” is only the English translation of ekklesia,
“called out ones.” (13)
What
about when Jesus said if two or three were gathered in His name, He
was there? (Matt. 18:20) So can the “Church” be two people? And
what about Paul saying Christ did not send him to baptize but to
preach the gospel? (1 Cor. 1:17) If baptism by a Church official is
necessary for entrance into the “Church” and the Body of Christ
(as Bayly writes), then Paul really missed that truth. Bayly
admonishes us to love our Mother, the Church. He seems to mean the organization rather than as I have taken the "love one another" command to mean, individuals.
That
being said, there is much I like in the book. I like his emphasis on
the solemnity of the Lord's Supper. It is much more than a mere
memorial and we do not hear that so much any more. I like his desire
to see more church discipline. We hardly see that at all any more
either.
Potential
readers who have studied Calvin or covenant theology will find
familiar material here. Preaching is the center of worship. (44)
Church discipline is to be exercised. (77) A particular order of
worship (from the Reformers) should be used. (99) The authority of
the Church should be recognized. (131 ff)
Potential
readers who are not familiar with the teachings of the Reformers may
be surprised at some Bayly writes. For example, Bayly says that the
real test of a pastor's devotion to the teaching of the apostles “is
whether we use the pulpit to call the women of the congregation to
submit to their husbands.” (51)
Young
pastors would do well to read this book to get an idea of how the
Church functioned in generations past.
You
can find out more about the book at
https://warhornmedia.com/2019/07/08/church-reformed/
My
rating: 3/5 stars.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67afc/67afce2d24d8a5f5e95a168a44d436ab2a7cc2c2" alt=""
Warhorn
Media, 183 pages.
I
received a complimentary copy of this book through The Barnabas
Agency. My comments are an independent and honest review.
No comments:
Post a Comment