God's
grace is at the heart of the relationship God offers us. He offers
this grace on His terms – that we surrender all Christ-less
exercises, rituals, etc., that attempt to persuade us that in some
way our efforts make us spiritually sufficient apart from Him.
“Sadly, within Christ-less religion, which predominates in
Christendom today, grace is only a word.” We must rid ourselves of
the performance based way of relating to God, Greg writes.
Greg
is strong on grace. I get that and I appreciate that. I have been
taught all my life that my relationship to God, through Christ, is
all by grace.
Greg
is strong in opposing anyone teaching that God will love them more if
they behave a certain way. I get that too.
But
I am uncomfortable with some of what is presented in this book. He
talks so much about Christ-less religion, as if that is what most of
Christianity is today. I just don't think that is true.
I
am a bit uncomfortable with his conclusions from some of Jesus'
parables. He seems to think he has insight into the true meaning of
some of the parables – something Christians have missed for two
thousand years. That kind of thinking is usually a red flag with me.
For
example, he goes to the “parable of the talents.” He interprets
the “talents,” or “bags of gold” as a newer translation has
it, as grace. “The third servant buried grace like a dead corpse.
It's an insult to God's vibrant grace to hide it, bury it, hoard it!”
The other two were commended by Jesus because they were willing to
spend the grace He had so freely given them.
And
with the “widow's mite,” Mark 12:38-44, Greg says, “Jesus was
denouncing institutions that bankrupt and further impoverish those
whom they ostensibly serve.” Watching the widow was a field trip
Jesus provided His disciples. “Jesus gives the widow as an example
of a religious victim – and in so doing he is providing clear,
unambiguous teaching that no human being should ever feel obligated
to give everything they have to a church or ministry.”
Sometimes
Greg is just unclear as to what he believes. He calls John 3:16 one
of the most misunderstood and most abused scriptures in the Bible.
God will, “in his own time and his own way, express his love and
make his love known to the whole world.” At times he almost sounds
like a universalist, writing of God's “all inclusive love.”.
Towards
the end he writes, “We are invited to receive God's grace and
accept, without stipulation or reservation what Jesus has done for
us.” Just “what Jesus has done for us” is unclear. He rejects
penal substitution, the concept that “Jesus took our place,
receiving the penalty we would otherwise receive from the father.”
He calls it “One of the most sinister teachings of all...” He
writes that accepting this teaching “casts doubts on the degree of
God's love and grace.” But nowhere does Greg then tell us what
Jesus did do on the cross.
Perhaps
what disturbs me the most is what Greg left out of his book. There is
nothing from Paul's writings, like running the race, or resisting the
devil, or anything about the many admonitions Paul has for living the
Christian life.
I
feel too uncomfortable about the book to recommend it.
Greg
Albrecht is president of Plain Truth Ministries, editor-in-chief of
Plain Truth magazine and teacher at Christianity Without
the Religion (www.ptm.org).
I
received a complimentary egalley of this book from the publisher (or
a representative of the publisher) for the purpose of this review.
No comments:
Post a Comment