data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c392c/c392c273c4eae02e04552b6081f5d789b3de2eb2" alt=""
I
like that he walks us through how scientists reason. He includes
logic, something not routinely taught in scientific studies. (Loc
2063/6558) I like how he gives common day examples of reasoning and
thinking. He points out the flaws of human thinking and how science
has specific processes to try and address the potential errors. Even
though the scientific process can evidence flaws, it is still the
most effective means we have of understanding the natural world.
I
like how Zimring addresses the differences in science and religion
and why appealing to the divine is outside the realm of science. I
was glad to see that he does not discount religion, noting that the
two deal with different aspects of reality.
I
was happy to see Zimring clarifying that science does not yield
absolute truth. We just do not live in that kind of a universe. (Loc
1679/6558) Theories are never proven but rather corroborated by
failed attempts to disprove them. (Loc 1202/6558)
This
is a good book for readers who want to better understand how science
is done and better evaluate the results of the scientific process.
You'll gain some good insights into thinking in general and how
conclusions are drawn. It is a long book but is well worth working
through.
My
rating: 4/5 stars.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65376/653767d390479c314681f8368cae7ce9aa8e2390" alt=""
Cambridge
University Press, 406 pages.
I
received a complimentary egalley of this book from the publisher. My
comments are an independent and honest review.
No comments:
Post a Comment