So why
another biography of Jesus? This one is different. The authors call
his book a theography. They tell the story of God's interaction with
humanity through the life of Jesus. They do not write about the
details of Jesus' life. They write about the narratives, symbols,
metaphors, and signs that are pictures of God touching humanity
through Jesus.
Sweet
and Viola believe all sixty-six books of the Bible are woven together
by a story line – the story of Jesus Christ. So their theography
begins with creation and ends with the consummation. They suggest
that reading the Bible through a christological lens changes the way
we see and approach the entire Bible.
The
authors use a great deal of symbolism in this book. Some of it, I
think, is be beyond normal literary use. They write, “Jesus refers
to Himself as a bird.” (26) The reference is Luke 13:34, “...how
often I have longed to gather your children together as a hen gathers
her chicks under her wings...” I think the simile is gathering and
protecting, not that Jesus is likening Himself to a chicken!
They
frequently have uncommon interpretations of Scripture (at least ones
I've never heard before). They say Eve was formed on the eighth day.
They then relate Eve to the church (as Adam prefigured Jesus). She is
a new creation. She came out of Adam, as the church came out of
Christ.
The
garden of Eden is compared to the temple of Israel, with much imagery
related. They have relied heavily on Hebrew tradition for this,
“...in the Hebrew tradition the temple and the garden are different
ways of talking about the same reality.” (207)
They
suggest that Canaan (the Promised Land) does not represent heaven but
the kingdom of God (warfare required).
The
section I found the oddest was that on stones as metaphors. They list
several places where stones were used, the first: “to guard the
entrance to the garden of Eden: a stone.” (79) They then relate
that to the resurrection account. “When Mary found the empty tomb
in the garden, she found the stone had been rolled away
(metaphorically, the stone guarding the garden of Eden)...” (83)
They list no footnote so where they got this idea is beyond me.
Later, they write, “In Genesis God told Cain that a sin offering
would be placed at the door of the garden.” (83) The footnote is to
Gen. 4:7. They must be reading a Bible vastly different from any I
have. Mine says “sin is crouching at your door” and nothing
about the door of the garden. (NIV)
And then
something else that just seems beyond normal was the short section on
aroma. “The psalmist said that God can smell a proud person from a
long way away: 'The proud He knows from afar,'” (232) The reference
is Psalm 138:6. The NIV says He “sees them from afar” and says
absolutely nothing about smell.
The
authors include a great deal of conjecture and imagining. They
imagine all the things Jesus remembered while carrying the cross (pp.
234-236). To me, that is the height of presumption and arrogance, to
think they know what was in the mind of Jesus during that time. The
very idea of a human putting thoughts into the mind of Jesus makes me
tremble.
Ultimately,
I had trouble with this book. I thought the initial idea, that the
entire bible was Jesus' story, was great. But as I read through the
book, there were just too many odd ideas, too many conjectures, too
many connections imagined in the minds of the authors where none
appears on the surface. I didn't like their relying so much on Hebrew
tradition, as if non-biblical Hebrew writers were as inspired as the
writers of the Old Testament. I don't think Hebrew tradition should
carry the same weight as the biblical text.
But I do
like their conclusion: “In short, the message of the gospel is
this: Jesus Christ is Lord (world ruler), Savior, the fulfillment of
the entire First Testament (including the Adamic commission, the
prophets, the priests, the kings, the sages, the temple, the
sacrifices, the land, the Law, the promises, and the entire story of
Israel), and the Resurrection and the Life.” (307)
I just
wish they had done a better job of presenting the evidence for their
conclusion.
To read
a free sample chapter, go to nelsonfree.com/theography. (Offer ends Dec. 31, 2012.)
Leonard
Sweet is the E. Stanley Jones Professor of Evangelism at Drew
University (NJ) and Distinguished Visiting Professor at George Fox
University (OR). He contributes to online resources and is rated
highly influential in the world of social media. He has written
numerous articles and more than fifty books. See more
leonardsweet.com.
Frank
Viola is a popular conference speaker and the best-seller author of
numerous books. He also writes a popular blog. See more at
frankviola.org and frankviola.net.
Thomas
Nelson Publishers, 419 pages (including 83 pages of footnotes).
I
received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for the
purpose of this review.
No comments:
Post a Comment